BetUS
BetNow
MyBookie
Bet105
BUSR Sports
Everygame Sports
BetOnline
BetWhale
BetAnything
Xbet
Bovada
Bookmaker
Ted Olson‘s history with the Wire Act goes back a lot further than you think.
Olson played a role advocating in favor of a broad interpretation of the Wire Act long before he stepped to the plate as leader-by-proxy representing Neopollard as part of New Hampshire‘s successful effort to have the new Justice Department opinion on the scope of the Wire Act changed.
It even predates Olson becoming the patron saint of New Jersey sports betting, championing the cause to victory at the Supreme Court. The New Hampshire case remains far from resolved finally, and we can learn from history in the meantime.
Flash all the way back to 2002 …
Back then, Olson represented the government in opposing Jay Cohen’s petition to have the Supreme Court hear his appeal regarding whether the operator of World Sports Exchange had “knowingly” transmitted information assisting in placing bets or wagers in violation of the Wire Act.
The Supreme Court chose not to hear the case that would have seen future Solicitor General Donald Verrilli (and celebrity lawyer Ben Brafman) face off against Olson. But the case is important, as it contributes to understanding the scope of the statute.
Who was Jay Cohen?
Cohen was an internet entrepreneur, who relocated in 1996 from San Francisco to Antigua, in the Caribbean. Looking to capitalize on the growing accessibility of the internet to Americans, Cohen set up “World Sports Exchange” or WSE.
That was a bookmaking website designed to feel like New York’s off-track betting sites. WSE advertised to Americans via radio, newspaper, and television. By late 1998, WSE attracted more than 1,600 customers and fielded more than 60,000 phone calls from U.S.-based phone numbers.
Cohen was so prominent a figure in the sports betting world that in 1997, he testified before Congress about internet wagering. But Cohen’s fortunes would turn when he was arrested in March 1998 on an eight-count indictment charging him with both conspiracy and substantive violations of the Wire Act.
Following a 10-day jury trial, he was convicted and sentenced to 21 months in prison. But Cohen was not done in his efforts.
What did Cohen ask the Supreme Court to review?
Cohen sought Supreme Court review of two issues. First, he argued that the government failed to prove that he had a “corrupt motive,” a common law doctrine that requires a general knowledge of the illegality of an activity for conspiracy prosecutions.
In essence, Cohen argued that he did not know what he was doing was illegal, so it was not possible to form a criminal conspiracy because knowledge of the criminality was lacking.
The second argument Cohen advanced was that the Second Circuit Court of Appeals erred in interpreting the words “legal,” “knowingly,” and “bets or wagers” in the Wire Act, and subsequently convicted Cohen for conduct that was not criminal.
So what did Olson say?
In an interesting statement — remember Olson is speaking here as Solicitor General representing the United States — Olson said:
Section 1084(a) makes it unlawful “knowingly” to transmit in interstate and foreign commerce (1) “bets or wagers” on sporting events; (2) “information assisting in the placing” of any such bets or wagers; or (3) a communication “which entitles the recipient to receive money or credit as a result of bets or wagers.”
Top Offshore Sportsbook Picks for October 2026
BetUS
200% up to $1,000Code: NEW20018+. Full T&C's apply.18+. Full T&C's apply. Sports bonus: 100% match up to $500. Casino bonus: 100% match up to $500. Enter promo code NEW200 at deposit and get up to a $1000 bonus. Valid on your first three (3) deposits. Available for all deposit methods. Minimum deposit of $50.Claim OfferBetNow
$2,500Code: WELCOME2518+. Full terms apply.18+ Full terms apply. 25% cash bonus. 5X rollover requirement. Minimum deposit: $20 Maximum bonus: $2,500Claim OfferMyBookie
$500 + $25 Casino Chip18+. Full terms apply.18+. Full terms apply. The Bet Back Bonus is available for new customers on first-time deposits of $50 or more. To redeem, select the offer in the cashier while completing your first deposit. Make your pick(s) in the Sportsbook and then select ‘Opt In to Use Your Bonus’. A Bet Back Bonus pop-up will display, select ‘Claim’ and then enter the risk amount to place your bet. If it wins, you keep your profits. If it loses, get 100% of your risk refunded as Free Play with only 1-time rollover. Free Play can then be used to place bets in the Sportsbook and earn cash. Additional T&Cs apply, please visit MyBookie to access the Help Center or contact Live Chat for more details.Claim OfferBet105
$50 Free BetCode: NFLBETTING18+. Full T&C's apply. North America only.18+. Full T&C's apply. This promotion is available only to new accounts in North America. Freeplay amount must be wagered five times (5x rollover) before it becomes eligible for withdrawal. Only prematch (sportsbook) bets count toward the 5x rollover requirement. Each person may claim only one bonus. If a customer creates multiple accounts to exploit this promotion, bet105 will mark all related accounts as ineligible and reclaim the funds. If a client receives more than two free bets without making a deposit, any winnings from those bets will be forfeited. This promotion applies only to the initial deposit or if specifically assigned by bet105.Claim OfferBUSR Sports
100% up to $1,000Code: 300SB1, 300SB2, 300SB318+. Full terms apply.18+. Full terms apply. New BUSR members only. Minimum deposit of $50 required per qualifying deposits. Codes 300SB1, 300SB2, and 300SB3 must be entered at the time of each corresponding deposit. Each code is valid one time only. Each bonus code must be claimed at least 24 hours apart. Only one promo code may be applied per deposit. A 20x rollover requirement applies to the combined total of your initial deposit and bonus before any withdrawal can be made. Redeemable in the Sportsbook only. BUSR management reserves the right to modify, suspend, or cancel this promotion at any time. Redeem each promo code in the cashier to get your bonus. Must be 18 or older. Please gamble responsibly. General House Rules Apply.Claim OfferEverygame Sports
100% up to $500Code: WELCOME50018+. Full terms apply.18+. Full terms apply. 100% up to $500 Bonus. Valid for non-crypto payment methods only. Minimum deposit amount $50. This offer is not available to customers from Canada or Mexico. The bonus code must be redeemed immediately after the deposit and before a wager has been placed. The sum of the deposit and the bonus are subject to rollover requirements of 12x at min. odds of -200 (1.5) before a new code can be redeemed. Max. $500 of each bet count towards the rollover requirements. Only bets placed on options that take place count towards the rollover requirements. Wagers on Horse Racing and Boosted Odds do not count towards the rollover requirements. All general Everygame Sportsbook rules apply.Claim OfferBetOnline
$250 + 100 Free SpinsCode: FREE25018+. Full T&C's apply.18+. Full T&C's apply.Claim OfferBetWhale
125% Sports Bonus + $25 ChipCode: SWIFTNESS18+. Full T&C's apply.SWIFTNESS: minimum deposit is $30, 10x WG, no max CO LOYALTY: 50x WG, 5x max CO 18+. Full T&C's apply.Claim OfferBetAnything
35% Free Play up to $105.21+. Full T&C's apply.21+. Full T&C's apply. Bonus: 35% of qualifying deposit, up to $105. Rollover: 8× (only sports action counts towards the rollover) deposit + bonus. Expiry: 7 days after credit. Hold period: 2 weeks. Payouts allowed only after rollover and hold period are completed. Example: Deposit $200 → Receive $50 Sports Free Play. Sports Free Play Rules: see the BetAnything General Reward Rules for eligible sports, wager types, odds, and rollover rules.Claim OfferXbet
50% up to $20021+. Full T&C's apply.21+. Full T&C's apply.Claim OfferBovada
50% up to $25018+. Full T&C's apply.18+. Full T&C's apply. This bonus can only be redeemed on your first deposit. Rollover is 5x Sports/5x Horses/30x Casino on both the initial deposit and the bonus amount. Rollover in our Sportsbook, for winning wagers, will be determined by the lesser of your risk or win amount at the time of wager settlement; for losing wagers your risk amount will be credited to your rollover contribution. Bonus funds cannot be used for play on Live Dealer games. Live Dealer play does not count toward meeting Casino rollover requirements for withdrawal. If a withdrawal is made before the bonus terms are met, all bonus funds as well as any money earned by wagering the bonus will be forfeited.Claim OfferBookmaker
100% up to $400 USDCode: GET10018+. Full terms apply.18+. Full terms apply.Claim OfferThe statute contains a “safe harbor” provision, 18 U.S.C. 1084(b), which exempts from its coverage transmissions of “information” (but not of bets or of “communications” of the type prohibited by the third clause of subsection (a)) between States or countries where betting on the particular sporting event at issue is “legal.”
Wait, what is this about horse racing?
Olson also brings up the scope of the Wire Act later in his opposition to Cohen’s petition. He does this in regard to a First Circuit Court of Appeals case involving an off-track-betting parlor in Rhode Island accepting bets on races in Massachusetts without permission of the track owner.
That's something that is required under the Interstate Horseracing Act. Olson wrote (internal citations omitted):
The plaintiff sought an injunction against the off-track betting facility under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), alleging that the facility was engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity by violating Section 1084(a) through its noncompliance with the IHA. The court of appeals denied the RICO injunction.
In so doing, it noted that because the off-track betting facility's business was legal under the laws of all interested States, it fell under the “safe harbor” provision of Section 1084(b). The court further noted that, in enacting the IHA, Congress had only created a private cause of action for damages on the part of certain parties and did not intend that there be government enforcement.
Consequently, the court concluded that the plaintiff could not use the IHA to avoid the applicability of the “safe harbor” provision-that is, “to transform an otherwise legal OTB business into a criminal racketeering enterprise.” The court was not confronted with and did not consider the question whether, for purposes of Section 1084(b), placing a bet is “legal” in a State that specifically prohibits it by statute but does not attach criminal penalties to the prohibition.
Antigua? Not quite
Olson further noted that Cohen’s argument that the account wagering (versus credit wagering) was legal because all the money was located within Antigua did not escape the reach of the Wire Act’s section 1084(b).
Olson argued (and the Supreme Court endorsed through denying certiorari) that the holding that Cohen needed only to intentionally knowingly engage in the conduct, not that he had to knowingly understand it to be illegal, was the scope required for a Wire Act conviction.
Now we fast-forward two decades
The lawsuit filed on behalf of Neopollard argued that the new Wire Act interpretation expands the scope of the statute beyond that intended by the statute’s congressional authors. Namely, the Wire Act was only ever intended to apply to sports betting and the NH court agreed.
There is not a great deal of overlap in Olson’s arguments in the Cohen case and the Neopollard filing. Olson does reference repeatedly — even back in 2001 — that the scope of the Wire Act requiring the underlying betting activity involves sporting events.
Interestingly, the May 2002 filing even pre-dates the Fifth Circuit’s holding that the Wire Act only applies to sporting events and contests. While these prior statements do not bind the federal government, they are informative.
They suggest the 2011 Virginia Seitz Wire Act opinion was long-held as the government’s view of the scope of the Wire Act, and the 2018 opinion is, in fact, a rogue interpretation of the statute.
The post What We Can Learn From Ted Olson's History With The Wire Act? appeared first on Legal Sports Report.
Original source: https://www.legalsportsreport.com/32826/holden-wire-act-ted-olson/
Top Offshore Sportsbook Picks for October 2026
BetUS
BetNow
MyBookie
Bet105
BUSR Sports
Everygame Sports
BetOnline
BetWhale
BetAnything
Xbet
Bovada