2019 NFL Weekly Betting Recap

2019 NFL Weekly Betting Recap

Need a one-stop shop for the weekly NFL betting results? We at Odds Shark have you covered. Check in each week for the betting results of every game and keep an eye on the year-to-date numbers to see if there’s any league-wide trends bettors can take advantage of.

Below you’ll see who covered the spread, who won outright and whether the game went OVER or UNDER. We also add up the records of each week and keep the year-to-date league-wide betting record.

Through two weeks of the new season, underdogs are now 18-13-11 ATS after going 9-7 in Week 2. UNDERs have been the hot wager thus far, as the O/U through 22 contests now sits at 12-20 after an amazing 13 of the 16 Week 2 contests went below the total.

Here's a breakdown of how things look heading into Week 3:

Week 2

Week 2 & year-to-date stats
SituationWeek 2 Year-to-Date
Underdogs vs Favorites (ATS)9-718-13-1
Home vs Away (ATS)5-1110-21-1
OVER/UNDER Record3-1312-20
SU Underdog Wins611
AFC Teams in Non-Conference Games (SU)2-42-6
AFC Teams in Non-Conference Games (ATS)2-44-4
NFC Teams in Non-Conference Games (SU)4-26-2
NFC Teams in Non-Conference Games (ATS)4-24-4
Totals in Non-Conference Games2-43-5
NFL Week 2 betting recap
MatchupSU WinnerATS WinnerTotal
Buccaneers vs PanthersTB 20-14TB +6.5UNDER 48.0
Vikings vs PackersGB 21-16GB -3.0UNDER 43.0
Seahawks vs SteelersSEA 28-26SEA +4.0OVER 47.0
Jaguars vs TexansHOU 13-12JAC +7.0UNDER 43.0
Cowboys vs RedskinsDAL 31-21DAL -6.0OVER 46.5
Colts vs TitansIND 19-17IND +3.0UNDER 43.5
Cardinals vs RavensBAL 23-17ARI +13.0UNDER 46.0
49ers vs BengalsSF 41-17SF +1.0OVER 46.0
Chargers vs LionsDET 13-10DET +1.0UNDER 47.0
Patriots vs DolphinsNE 43-0NE -18.0UNDER 48.5
Bills vs GiantsBUF 28-14BUF -1.0UNDER 44.5
Chiefs vs RaidersKC 28-10KC -7.0UNDER 53.0
Saints vs RamsLAR 27-9LAR -2.0UNDER 52.5
Bears vs BroncosCHI 16-14DEN +3.0UNDER 40.5
Eagles vs FalconsATL 24-20ATL +1.0UNDER 53.0
Browns vs JetsCLE 23-3CLE -6.5UNDER 45.0



Original Article Source link

Relevant news

Leave a Reply